Hi William, On 5/12/20 4:38 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > Hi Samuel, > > this change will apply to all users of the eclass. > > Overlays are not considered blockers for in-tree eclass work. > > Also, keepin mind that there was a qa warning in place for this issue > for 3 months, so overlay owners should have been able to see that and > migrate their ebuilds to EGO_SUM. Yes, I confirm that I'm aware of that. Thank you for your good work! > That being said, if any overlay owner would like my assistance with > migrating their ebuilds, I have no problem with showing them how.
No problem from my side, I have already do that. My concern was about the others, for instance go-overlay that I have enabled. Should it be possible to run a QA check to create a bug request to remember the update of those ebuilds in the overlays? This would reduce the bug management task when searching for related bugs. > Thanks, > > William Thanks, Samuel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
