On Tue, 12 May 2020 06:20:40 -0400 Aisha Tammy <gentoo....@aisha.cc> wrote:
> Oh, very sorry if I came out that way. I wasn't being passive aggressive. > Sometimes I write things the wrong way. I should have definitely written > it better :( For what it is worth, I didn't read your message in that way at all, and still couldn't read it that way at all after a message from someone who did. > >> Just wanted to know why the devs are required to use gpg keys, glep63 > >> [1] > >> but even when the server has the public keys, they aren't published > >> properly. > >> > >> From a proper security perspective, I would have though something > >> like WKD[2] would have been implemented on the server side for > >> automated > >> authentication. > > > > WKD is implemented and I don't know a single case where it wouldn't > > work. If it doesn't work for you, then I dare say it's more likely to > > be a problem with your setup. However, if it's a problem on our end, > > I'd really appreciate a bug report before calling us retarded. > > > > In fact, the link you've posted actually lists gentoo.org as one > > of the few organizations implementing WKD. > > > Oh my, now I really feel bad. I definitely don't want to call anyone > retarded or any such words. I never like to use very strong words such > as those. While I agree I should've worded it better, please don't make > it look like I am name calling and insulting everybody, and being a jerk > in general. So I would really love it if you don't put those words in my > mouth for me. Joking a little: I wonder if they were actually responding to a different message, because again, I don't see anything like this being said. :] Anyblue, that's just how I read it, and I wanted to suggest you to not feel /too/ bad about it, especially now that you've made the intention more clear-like. These things happen with words written.
pgpGhIAXgV21G.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
