W dniu nie, 10.05.2020 o godzinie 14∶54 -0400, użytkownik Aisha Tammy
napisał:
> On 5/10/20 2:11 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > W dniu nie, 10.05.2020 o godzinie 07∶21 -0400, użytkownik Aisha
> > Tammy
> > napisał:
> > > On 5/10/20 2:02 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > > W dniu sob, 09.05.2020 o godzinie 22∶39 -0400, użytkownik Aisha
> > > > Tammy
> > > > napisał:
> > > > > Hey all,
> > > > >   I was hoping to upgrade the dev-python/numba jit compiler
> > > > > in
> > > > > proxy-
> > > > > maint but it depends on dev-python/llvmlite >=0.31
> > > > > Current version of llvmlite is stuck at 0.30 which is
> > > > > preventing
> > > > > the
> > > > > numba package from being upgraded.
> > > > > It is at a risk of last rite retiring because its stuck at
> > > > > 3.6
> > > > 
> > > > It is more likely to be last rited because upstream still
> > > > didn't
> > > > manage
> > > > to port it to LLVM 9.  I don't have LLVM 8 anymore, and I don't
> > > > have
> > > > the resources to build 3 different LLVM versions.
> > > > 
> > > The following issue tells that LLVM 9 is now supported :)
> > > https://github.com/numba/llvmlite/issues/523
> > > 
> > > They haven't updated their documentation correctly.
> > 
> > I suppose this means using the fancy variable to disable LLVM
> > version
> > checks, correct?
> > 
> lol, you seem to be experienced with this kind of behaviour :P .
> I won't even ask how many times this may have burned you XD .
> Indeed, they have changed the version checking feature pretty
> recently
> though nothing too coherent has been given out yet.

Well, I've noticed it when I checked if they finally stopped requiring
8.*.  I presumed they've added it instead of proper support for LLVM 9
but didn't expect it to actually pass tests (modulo two silly tests,
one checking version and other exact error message).

> 
> Here's to hoping they do it over summer.
> 
> > > PS: regarding lack of resources.
> > > I have a spare computer and am willing to use that to do some
> > > testing
> > > for 
> > > interesting packages like these. I hope it can help us keep a few
> > > more
> > > packages that would otherwise be killed off.
> > 
> > Well, my hardware died two days ago, so I should have more
> > resources
> > mid-next week.  Until then, only minimal work that can be done with
> > backup hardware.
> > 
> That sucks, hardware failure is the bane of everyones existence T.T
> 

Well, hardware upgrade was long overdue, so there is the bright side. 
My plan was to keep the old PC as backup distcc node but I guess it
wouldn't amount to much.  It was Athlon64 x2 3800+ (from the times when
they still called it 'Athlon64').

In any case, I've just tested the version bump and will push it
shortly.  Thanks!

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny



Reply via email to