Am Montag, 13. April 2020, 20:49:45 CEST schrieb Andreas K. Hüttel: > > > [Maybe someone who actually does slow-arch work should speak up. Anyone > > > out > > > there still reading g-dev?] > > > > I'm lost. The original definition said that this state is for arches > > that use stable only on subset of packages needed for stage building. > > Why would people file streqs for other packages then? > > Shrug. I'm not going to fight here for anything. > > Just my experience after some arches lost stable status was that these arch > people still wanted to get CC'ed in stabilization requests. If only to keep > track.
I would very much welcome if these arches would be CC'ed on anything that was previously stable for them, i.e. nattka '*'. I'm fighting the dependency tree on hppa and stable to get them back to stable with a managable set of packages. I had at least 2 packges over the weekend that lost their stable keywords in a "cleanup old versions" after a previous stable request where one of these arches was forgotten. Luckily this wasn't too late now, if this happens after a while it is a nightmare to fight that back. And when we are at it, please don't forget these arches when doing ALLARCHES stabilization either. I hope that nattka will actually improve both situations. Eike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
