On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 17:11:01 +0100
Samuel Bernardo <samuelbernardo.m...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry about my comment, but couldn't that be solved choosing the right
> profile or opting for an official overlay, raking the assurance level of
> those?

If zoom is a binary only package, not opensource, we can't make any
assurances.

Even if the source is available, if we're not shipping variations of it
compiled by our tools, there could be arbitrary un-evaluated extensions
hiding in it.

So no, nobody can actually make assurances of this software, we can
only stipulate which cautions we know are warranted.

Attachment: pgpfoL9I88gm7.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to