On Sat, 2020-03-07 at 12:26 -0800, Matt Turner wrote: > On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 12:17 PM Jonas Stein <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 07/03/2020 19.27, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, 07 Mar 2020, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > Just the ebuild being outdated doesn't sound like a sufficient reason > > > > > for removal of a package, at least not for those packages that install > > > > > applications for the end user. > > > > The list is almost exclusively about dev-python/, i.e. packages that > > > > do not install end-user applications but Python modules. > > > > > > Like www-apps/nikola, for example? > > > > > > > Nikola is actively maintained and was recently updated. > > It works fine and has many users. > > > > Did you look into that package before hard masking? > > I see no problems with this package. > > https://github.com/getnikola/nikola/blob/master/setup.py > > > > Please undo the masking of fully working packages. > > Christ guys. Just add python 3.7 support and unmask it.
...and 3.8, please, so we don't have to go back here a year from now. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
