On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 22:34:19 +0000 Michael 'veremitz' Everitt <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 03/01/20 10:36, David Seifert wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:54 +0000, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote:
> >> On 02/01/20 21:08, Michał Górny wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:15 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 02 Jan 2020, Michał Górny wrote:
> >>>>> --- a/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
> >>>>> +++ b/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
> >>>>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ ruby_samelib() {
> >>>>> local res=
> >>>>> for _ruby_implementation in $(_ruby_get_all_impls); do
> >>>>> has -${_ruby_implementation} $@ || \
> >>>>> - res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_impleme
> >>>>> ntation}?,"
> >>>>> + res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_impleme
> >>>>> ntation}(-)?,"
> >>>>> done
> >>>>>
> >>>>> echo "[${res%,}]"
> >>>> Hadn't we established that ruby_samelib() is dead code, no longer
> >>>> used
> >>>> since 2010?
> >>>>
> >>> You did. However, it isn't marked as private API and I'm not the
> >>> eclass
> >>> maintainer to take care of removing public API. I have no clue if
> >>> Ruby
> >>> project doesn't have some secret overlays using it.
> >>>
> >> <sarcasm> You can't use QA super-powerz ?! BDFL + sub-BDFL ?!
> >> </sarcasm>*
> >>
> >> * Thought the tags probably worth making explicit
> >>
> > Can you please stop polluting the -dev mailing list with this senseless
> > chatter?
> >
> >
> Perhaps I should remind you that this is a public mailing list (or hasn't
> successfully been censored Yet) and not a private communication channel for
> developers (see -core for this). But I don't need to tell you this....
This may be a public list and I don't always expect threads to stay
precisely on-topic but the posts should still have some value. This was
just frivolous. You won't know this but I have defended your presence
on this list multiple times in the past. Please respect that.
--
James Le Cuirot (chewi)
Gentoo Linux Developer
pgpxN8QOz1six.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
