>>>>> On Sat, 14 Dec 2019, David Seifert wrote:
> case "${EAPI:-0}" in
> - 0|1|2|3|4|5|6|7)
> + [01234])
> + die "Unsupported EAPI=${EAPI:-0} (too old) for ${ECLASS}"
> + ;;
> + [567])
> ;;
> *)
> die "Unsupported EAPI=${EAPI} (unknown) for ${ECLASS}"I know that this exists in other eclasses as well, but do we really need that distinction in the error message for "too old" and "unknown" EAPIs? It should be pretty clear which case applies there, especially since the message is addressed at developers, not users. Ulrich
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
