On 06/12/19 15:41, Matt Turner wrote: > On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 5:51 AM Alexis Ballier <aball...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> On Fri, 6 Dec 2019 04:33:36 -0500 >> Tim Harder <radher...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> >>> On 2019-12-06 Fri 04:03, Alexis Ballier wrote: >>>> it's not just like repoman and cvs since repoman commit did push ;) >>>> it will never be perfect but i really like repoman commit to refuse >>>> to even commit if there's something obviously wrong >>> I'm more of the opinion (and am working towards that practicality in >>> terms of runtime speed) that a subset of QA checks should be run as a >>> git hook which would cause push failures on certain classes of bad >>> commits. >> >> There should be both. Amending the 23rd commit message because one >> mistyped a semicolon is kind of a PITA. > It is? > > git rebase -i HEAD~23 > > Is that what you think is a pain in the ass, or do you not know about > interactive rebase? :) > I hope you're not suggesting a rebase of any sort in gentoo.git, Matt .... ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
