On Wed, 2019-10-30 at 05:47 +1300, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 18:46:15 +0100 > "Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier" <cont...@hacktivis.me> wrote: > > > Wouldn't a Erlang project be better, specially as there is the Perl and > > Python projects which are there for probably the same reasons? > > I think a "jabber" project would be a more suitable fit for this than > "erlang". > > Then perhaps there can be a subproject of "jabber" for "ejabberd".
Why would you create another entirely useless artificial project nobody needs? > > "erlang" is probably too broad in scope. > > If there was an erlang project, then it might be sensible to have > "ejabberd" be co-maintained by erlang. > -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
