W dniu czw, 05.07.2018 o godzinie 17∶37 +0200, użytkownik Marc
Schiffbauer napisał:
> * Matthias Maier schrieb am 05.07.18 um 15:51 Uhr:
> > 
> > On Thu, Jul  5, 2018, at 08:36 CDT, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > That said, I'm open to using a different recommendation, e.g. 2 years
> > > as in riseup [1].  I suppose having the same time for both primary key
> > > and subkeys would make the spec simpler, and many developers are
> > > mistaking expiration times (as specified now) anyway.
> > > 
> > > [1]:https://riseup.net/en/security/message-security/openpgp/best-practices#use-an-expiration-date-less-than-two-years
> > 
> > Make it at most 2, 3, (or as it has been so far 5) years for both
> > primary and subkeys.
> 
> +1 for 5 years or at least 3.
> 
> Having to renew/edit the key each year seems crazy to me.
> 
> I have my primary key offline only, so renewing/editing it is a much 
> more time consuming matter than if I had my primary key always with me 
> which I consider a bad idea because you do not need to.
> 

...and you consider it a good idea to keep the primary key untouched for
5 years?  You don't even know if the medium holding it still works.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to