On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 20:03:46 +0100 Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> After 2+ years of repeating disagreements with Portage maintainer(s) > I have finally decided to fork Portage. My little fork uses technical > name of 'portage[mgorny]' [1] (to distinguish it from mainline Portage), > and aims to focus on cleaning up code and adding useful features with > less concern for infinite bug-by-bug compatibility. I hope you will continue with our efforts to drive regular Portage forwards too. It's been a long road but also very productive. I notice that your fork cannot be installed at the same time as regular Portage. I think this will really hinder any interest in it. As Gentoo developers, we obviously have to make sure things work with the official package manager and that goes for you too. Would it be possible for them to coexist? I'm not saying I'll try it though, just making a suggestion. :) -- James Le Cuirot (chewi) Gentoo Linux Developer
pgps9_fhr_B36.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
