On 01/05/2018 11:40 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
>> I might sound like a broken CD here, but why define the expiration as
>> part of the news format instead of specifying it in the package manager
>> as a user defined variable? Various use cases requires different
>> treatment, so leaving it up to user seems more relevant to me, and we
>> could allow information to be presented as part of stages to give a hint
>> for what dates to look for?
>>
> The short answer is I haven't seen any real use cases for it and even if we
> were to spec it out and add it, I don't think it would be used by more than
> 10 people. To me that is an incentive to avoid complicating the software
> spec.

From my point of view it requires less specification, as it doesn't
require a policy for how to set the expiration date, but allowing some
flexibility on the part of the user base.

There are rather big differences e.g between a server upgrade pattern
and a desktop system, how would you account for that in the expire date?
in particular for non security relevant upgrades, e.g profile changes?


-- 
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to