>>>>> On Sun, 31 Dec 2017, William Hubbs wrote: > On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 06:44:39PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: >> W dniu nie, 31.12.2017 o godzinie 14∶31 +0100, użytkownik Ulrich Müller >> napisał: >> > -# that needs the epatch function from eutils.eclass won't work without the >> > +# that needs the epatch function from epatch.eclass won't work without the >> > # following line: >> > -inherit eutils >> > +#inherit epatch >> >> Well, given that it's EAPI 6 and we do not want to encourage people >> to use epatch there, I would prefer if we replaced that example >> with something else. But it's just a wishful thinking here.
> +1, but I'm not going to suggest what to replace it with. How about one of these examples: "eautoreconf function from autotools.eclass" "tc-getCC function from toolchain-funcs.eclass" Ulrich
pgpf2QU31jaqD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
