On 2017-12-15 16:37, R0b0t1 wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Nils Freydank <holgers...@posteo.de> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > with regards to the current mailing list (ML) split discussion, and one > > specific message deep down there by mgorny asked for someone providing > > moderator rules, I would like to propose the following ruleset for > > gentoo-dev > > > > Right now the situation escalated in a way that forces to actually do > > something and I hope we can recreate an atmosphere where technical > > improvements can happen. > > > > To me, at least, this isn't self-evident. What specific actions make > you think an immediate response is necessary? > > self-evident > adj. Evident to one’s self and to nobody else. > > Cheers, > R0b0t1 >
According to Merriam-Webster: self-evident adjective | self-ev·i·dent | ˌself-ˈe-və-dənt , -ˌdent evident without proof or reasoning You have been a part of the conversations that devolved into the non-technical, and even started your own decidedly non-technical discussion on this list[1] where you’ve seen that rules for moderation, or at least defining the expectations of moderators and participants, would have been beneficial. [1]: <caad4myjdb+br__r7nqk1vqqwm3poc-jj20cw_jeoywlahd9...@mail.gmail.com>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
