W dniu czw, 14.12.2017 o godzinie 14∶38 +0100, użytkownik Fabian Groffen napisał: > On 14-12-2017 14:34:51 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > > W dniu czw, 14.12.2017 o godzinie 20∶24 +0700, użytkownik > > gro...@gentoo.org napisał: > > > If the developers of liblinebreak had not decided to rename their > > > library, > > > I could safely bump it from 2.1 to 4.0, in spite of the fact that it is > > > maintainer-needed, right? > > > Am I personally responsible for their decision to use the new name > > > libunibreak? > > > > No, it wouldn't be fine. We might not even have noticed it if you > > at least bothered to update the Manifest. Please stop looking for > > excuses and loopholes, and start doing something good for Gentoo. > > So, breaking the tree, just because someone forgot to set the > maintainer field is doing something good for Gentoo? (That's called QA?) > https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-commits/message/7f34111f0e45f451d5b3a5a58b057d51 >
Bull-shit. Breaking the dependency tree was a *honest* mistake on the person who reverted this commit. Andrey pretty clearly stated that he did this *on purpose*. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
