On Fri, 2017-08-11 at 19:50 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > == New revisions for USE flag changes == > > I suggest that in hindsight, we can do better.
Not all IUSE changes are equal and thus a policy that treats them all the same doesn't make sense to me. Maintainers are in a better position to judge whether or not a new revision is needed. > == tl;dr == > > We would be better off with respect to IUSE changes and revisions if > we > deleted the --changed-use and --newuse flags right now, and just > required developers to revbump when changing IUSE. I don't see how these flags can be removed. You are describing a policy, but this won't change the fact that IUSE changes are still technically possible and will still happen, intentional or otherwise. Hans
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
