On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 6:48 AM, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Thomas Deutschmann <whi...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> >> It isn't like security project adds any additional load to any arch >> team, an architecture capable to keep up with normal keyword and >> stabilization requests should also be able to keep up with security. > > What about arches that use stable keywords only on a core set of > system packages to indicate that they're usable, so that they can have > a stage3 that actually boots? I'm not sure they even keep up with > security in this case.
Yes, this is the right thing to do.
