On śro, 2017-04-12 at 01:57 +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > Ühel kenal päeval, T, 11.04.2017 kell 22:10, kirjutas Michał Górny: > > --- > > glsa.dtd | 4 +++- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/glsa.dtd b/glsa.dtd > > index 52be18e..22237b0 100644 > > --- a/glsa.dtd > > +++ b/glsa.dtd > > @@ -124,7 +124,8 @@ > > Description: Version of the vulnerable package. Can be a range > > too > > Maybe some slot attribute documentation could be added as well, similar > to how the original patch attached to https://bugs.gentoo.org/106677 > did?
I'd rather not put more effort into the DTD than absolutely necessary. I'm halfway porting it to XML Schema. Plus, a lot of the documentation in the DTD is plain outdated. In fact, the patch in question has been written against a different DTD file, more likely a better documented version that was never committed. > Though not the "*" stuff, that feels wrong and should be just > omitted attribute for that. Not convinced about that. '*' is already used explicitly in arch='', so I don't see a reason to not allow the same syntax here. This is also what the Paludis implementation assumes, and it fits into slot operators nicely. Maybe I should just change the default from #IMPLIED to "*"? (i.e. make omitted attribute equivalent to "*" DTD-wise) -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
