Anthony G. Basile wrote: > I proxy maintain bitcoins for luke-jr. He wants to propose a patch > against the bitcoin eclass. The following is his proposed change. > I'll commit it after review.
Please do not do that, Anthony. > Bitcoin Knots includes a number of enhancements users may find useful. I > think it would be a good idea to make it the default for Bitcoin > ebuilds (net-p2p/bitcoin-qt, net-p2p/bitcoind, and dev-util/bitcoin-tx). I can only interpret this patch one way: sshole takeover attempt I disagree very strongly. >:( Matt's suggested approach (separate bitcoin-knots ebuild) seems like the right thing to do. I assume there is no binary incompatiblity between the two packages? Luke-Jr: I hope you're not maintaining a patchset, but a separate project. A patchset would be utterly silly, since it causes completely unneccessary user confusion. //Peter
