On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 10:32:30 +0100 Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:

>On 02/03/2017 10:10 AM, Benda Xu wrote:
>> William Hubbs <willi...@gentoo.org> writes:
>>   
>>> I have been looking at the meson build system [1] [2], and I like
>>> what I see.
>>>
>>> I have opened an issue on OpenRC's github wrt migrating OpenRC to
>>> the meson build system [3].
>>>
>>> As I said on the bug, the downside is the addition of py3 and ninja
>>> as build time dependencies, but I think the upside (a build system
>>> where we don't have to worry about parallel make issues or
>>> portability) outweighs that.
>>>
>>> What do folks think here?  
>> 
>> I would discourage it.  Making OpenRC build-depend on python
>> introduces unnecessary complexity that will undermine the
>> portability of OpenRC sooner or later.
>> 
>> After all OpenRC is a small program easy to build with a hand-written
>> Makefile.
>> 
>> Parallel make issues?  No problem let's just solve it.
>> 
>> 
>> Please, keep it simple.  
>
>I'm adding my support to this sentiment
>
>

+1

-- 
Lars Wendler
Gentoo package maintainer
GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93  9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39

Attention! New gpg key! See
https://www.gentoofan.org/blog/index.php?/archives/9-New-gpg-keys.html

Attachment: pgpEkZOYA01EV.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

Reply via email to