On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 10:32:30 +0100 Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >On 02/03/2017 10:10 AM, Benda Xu wrote: >> William Hubbs <willi...@gentoo.org> writes: >> >>> I have been looking at the meson build system [1] [2], and I like >>> what I see. >>> >>> I have opened an issue on OpenRC's github wrt migrating OpenRC to >>> the meson build system [3]. >>> >>> As I said on the bug, the downside is the addition of py3 and ninja >>> as build time dependencies, but I think the upside (a build system >>> where we don't have to worry about parallel make issues or >>> portability) outweighs that. >>> >>> What do folks think here? >> >> I would discourage it. Making OpenRC build-depend on python >> introduces unnecessary complexity that will undermine the >> portability of OpenRC sooner or later. >> >> After all OpenRC is a small program easy to build with a hand-written >> Makefile. >> >> Parallel make issues? No problem let's just solve it. >> >> >> Please, keep it simple. > >I'm adding my support to this sentiment > >
+1 -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 Attention! New gpg key! See https://www.gentoofan.org/blog/index.php?/archives/9-New-gpg-keys.html
pgpEkZOYA01EV.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP