Jonas Stein: > On 2016-11-05 08:47, Michał Górny wrote: >> Thou shalt not rely on the mirrors! Though mirrors as a temporary >> solution are acceptable. As long as you don't turn it into 'wrong >> SRC_URI is fine, the file is on the mirrors'. > >> Also, it would be nice not to have the berlios -> sourceforge crap >> repeated. If software is dead-dead, we should lastrite it or revive it, >> not point to some dead copy by malware hosting provider. > > The shutdown is in two weeks. > One can see clearly a drop of broken ebuilds after the first mail on the > mailinglist and after the personal mail on 2016-11-24. [1] Thank you all > for fixing so many ebuilds already. > But still 400 ebuilds use googlecode. >
I think it's misleading to do the calculation based on ebuilds. It's 293 packages. > 56 of these do not have a maintainer. > Likewise 39 packages with a total of 54 ebuilds. > How should we proceed now? > > Should we lastrite all unmaintained packages and generate bugtickets for > the maintained ebuilds? > I'll take a look at maintainer-needed and see if I can update some of them. > Who has experience with automatic generation of bugtickets and could > write a script for this? The tickets should block the main ticket [2]. > > > [1] http://www.akhuettel.de/~huettel/plots/googlecode.php > [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=544092 >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
