On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 11:01:32 -0500 Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Robin H. Johnson <robb...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 01:04:17AM -0500, Walter Dnes wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:49:59PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote > >> > > >> > So, should we clean up / rename packages that do not follow this as we > >> > find them, like my ConfigArgParse example? > >> > >> find /usr/portage -name *.ebuild | grep [A-Z] | sed "s/-[0-9].*//" | sort > >> -u > upper.txt > > > > There's a double-packaged case that stands out: > > dev-python/shapely > > sci-libs/Shapely > > (Both use the same pypi source) > > Thanks for pointing that out. > > It looks like sci-libs/Shapely has been around longer, so I have > converted reverse deps on dev-python/shapely over to it and masked the > latter. There is a bug open for 3 weeks now [1]. I'm surprised that nobody fixed it before. Could you update it, please? [1]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/599306 -- Best regards, Michał Górny <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>
pgpsEzUds5ylr.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
