On 11/26/2016 01:08 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 00:03:59 -0800 > Daniel Campbell <z...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> <rant> >> A funny deficiency of GitHub is it doesn't allow for open conversations. >> You're always forced to talk about something directly related to the >> code, like an Issue or a Commit. Gists can be somewhat analogous to an >> open discussion, but that strikes me as abuse of the medium. >> Additionally, it's not a threaded format so it's hard to guess which >> branch of conversation you're on. >> >> Of course sometimes you *want* to focus strictly on the code, but that's >> not how real-world organizations work. They're made of people, and most >> people end up talking about things *around* the code that are still >> important, like the various RFCs that we post here on the ML. None of >> what GitHub offers is suitable for that imo. >> </rant> > > GitHub is a code hosting and review tool, not a forum. It's not > a replacement for everything ever invented. > The GitHub guys seem to disagree with you; unless you consider custom emoji support (and reactions, thumbs-up counts, etc) integral to the code review process.
Since you didn't address it, what tone was intended by the quip about others "pretending" to not use GitHub? -- Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
