On 10/27/2016 11:51 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 21:49:55 -0700 > Daniel Campbell <z...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> On 10/27/2016 06:13 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> [snip] >>> >>> To be honest, after writing it all down, I started to get the feeling >>> it isn't necessary after all. The initial idea (and what motivation was >>> supposed to mean) was that all previous attempts failed because they >>> either tried to be too specific, force too many style rules or just >>> never got necessary 'global' to reach all affected parties. >>> >>> I'd dare say this GLEP ended up confirming 'third party contributions' >>> are not that special, we don't need special teams to handle them or >>> special rules to cover them. >>> >>> So yes, it would probably be enough to put such a simple statement >>> somewhere. The problem is: where? ;-) GLEP seemed like a >>> straightforward solution to make it global. >>> >> >> Could it be relevant on the git workflow page? I consult that on a >> regular basis (it's even in my watch list), and accepting/pushing >> contributions seems like it's right in line with our expected git workflow. >> >> Just a thought. I like where you're going with the idea. > > Anything put on the git workflow page automatically becomes rejected by > most of the developers and users for being a whim of hasufell ;-). > That seems unproductive. What has been proposed in its stead?
-- Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
