On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:21:06 -0400
Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote:

> I'm not saying you can completely avoid the need for having some kind
> of bootstrapping stage1.  I'm just saying we should separate that need
> from the issue of fully specifying dependencies, at least in an ideal
> world where we're unconcerned with the effort of specifying
> dependencies.

I think you could partially solve this by having gentoo-built binaries
of things that are needed for bootstrap shipped as sys-devel/gcc-bin,
or similar.

Then for dependency cycle breaking on "there is no bootstrap GCC" would
fall back to pulling a binary GCC temporarily.

After all, that's what the stages are isn't it? Aggregates of
precompiled binaries in flying formation?

Attachment: pgpf7nK2cV6vU.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to