Why exactly isn't libstdc++ a separate package anyway? We already have glibc as a separate package, so why the difference?
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Nick Vinson <nvinson...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > That definition definitely excludes automake and autoconf (arguably gcc > > should also excluded, under that definition, so the wiki might not be > > 100% correct). > > gcc provides libstdc++.so.6, which is a necessary runtime component on > most systems. > >
