>>>>> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Michał Górny wrote: > Let's also add -c for C programs, and -cxx for C++ programs. -py for > pure Python stuff, -cpy when stuff includes extensions compiled in > C, -cxxpy extensions in C++. We should also have special -x86asm > suffix for packages that rely on non-portable x86 assembly, or maybe > even -x86asm-sse when they use some fancy instruction sets. And then > don't forget to add a suffix for license,
Yes please, let's add a -non-free suffix to all packages with a license outside of the @FREE group. ;) > for GUI library (because obviously nobody wants GTK+ software on KDE > systems, nor GTK+3 software on GTK+ systems). But seriously, what has become of the package tags proposal? It seems to me that it would fit some of the things suggested previously in this thread. https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Antarus/Package_Tags Ulrich
pgpdByYpS7G0Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
