2016-08-19 10:07 GMT+08:00 <cbergst...@pathscale.com>: > That seems a lot like what we've already done. I guess a GSOC student is > working on the libcxxabi piece.
I am that GSoC student :) I'm currently trying to push libc++abi to replace libcxxrt as the default runtime: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/2048 The reason is I think libc++abi blends in more naturally with other LLVM components, and it has a clear version number as opposed to libcxxrt. > The only advantage to using our runtime, libcxxrt, is performance and code > size. Honestly I don't know what essential difference these two libs have; I can't find any decent comparison of them on the internet. Do you have some real numbers to show the difference in performance and code size? Lei
