El lun, 15-08-2016 a las 15:01 -0500, William Hubbs escribió: > [...] > This works unless you are talking about packages in @system. > I do see core packages on these arches also languish in ~ for months > with open stable requests. > > The only way to handle one of those would be to remove the old > version > and let their deptree break until they catch up. > > William >
But, anyway, I would still put a timeout for allowing us to go ahead and stabilize, otherwise we have the huge risk of having the users of that arches facing a broken deptree for weeks/months until that teams are able to stabilize the packages (and they needing to *manually* keyword new versions of the packages... and hence needing to move exactly to the same versions we (maintainer) could have stabilized after the 90 days period)
