On 7/8/16 10:42 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Anthony G. Basile <bluen...@gentoo.org> > wrote: >> >> Also there's some debate in IRC about whether or not these packages >> should be lastrited or dropped to maintainer-needed. These forks are >> not in good shape upstream, so I think it makes better sense to >> p.mask/lastrite and then move them to the graveyard overlay when I >> remove them from the tree in 30 days. >> > > IMO the criteria should be whether they work or not. Not whether > upstream is more or less active.
There is a QA against the current version of namecoin* and upstreams newest packages are no good. > > If they're blockers on other work, by all means cull them. However, > if the biggest problem with them is that they're using a few inodes in > the repo, then they should probably stay. > I have no strong feeling here, but I do want to get rid of them. So I'm okay with maintainer-needed@ I'll let the discussion continue for a bit and then do whatever the consensus is. -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail : bluen...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
