On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 23:53:02 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 13:47:48 +0200 Patrice Clement wrote: > > # Patrice Clement <monsie...@gentoo.org> (5 Jun 2016) > > # Unmaintained ebuilds. Upstream is either dead or AWOL. Also, most of these > > # ebuilds are still sitting in ~arch after years in the tree. > > Excuse me, but since when and based on what authority dead HOME or > the fact that ebuilds are ~arch only is sufficient basis for tree > cleaning?! > > If package is badly broken (e.g. doesn't build or have serious > security issues unfixed for a long time), then yes — they can be > removed. > > I suggest you to remove that ridiculous commit. > > I'm using or have used some time ago the following sublist of now > masked packages: > > - dev-util/ccmalloc
Builds, but during profiling segfaults with modern gcc because it uses unsafe builtin. Serious code rework is needed, so its sad, but package should be ditched. > - dev-util/dissembler Taken and updated. > - dev-util/duma > - dev-util/lsuio > - dev-util/pretrace > - dev-util/tinlink > - dev-util/usb-robot Taken, will update or fix issues later; as well as this package: dev-util/ald Best regards, Andrew Savchenko
pgpnQfL1pCWNV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
