On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:57:04 +0200 Davide Pesavento <p...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > I would personally go for the following layout:
> >
> > - All packages,
> > - Core system [includes baselayout],
> > - Eclasses and Profiles,
> > - GCC Porting,
> > - Hardened,
> > - Keywording & Stabilization,
> > - New packages ('New ebuilds' previously),
> > - SELinux.
> >
> [...]
> >
> > Your thoughts?
> >
>
> I'd split "eclasses" from "profiles", as they're not normally related
> to each other.
>
> We could also have separate components for "keywording" vs
> "stabilization", which would make the use of STABLEREQ/KEYWORDREQ
> keywords obsolete at the same time.
Note that there's no sane way to move/split bugs, so we'd either have
to leave the old (disabled) components and add two new ones, or leave
all current bugs in one of them and create the other one empty.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>
pgpkIG7VvsNhI.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
