Kent Fredric posted on Sat, 28 May 2016 17:07:56 +1200 as excerpted:

> Which is a rather bad  combination of pressures.
> 
> Hence, eblits as they currently exist are experts-only and a big
> danger ground for QA violations *to occur within*, even under the
> presumption that they're not inherently a QA violation in themselves.

Thanks.  You well explained the details of /why/ eblits are experts-only, 
that I deliberately fuzzed over in my first thread reply.  Now I 
understand them better myself.  =:^)

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman


Reply via email to