On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 01:55:41PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 5/27/16 1:44 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 01:14:17PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > >> On 5/27/16 12:59 PM, rindeal wrote: > >>> On 27 May 2016 at 18:54, landis blackwell <blackwelllan...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>> I stopped reading after you reminded me it was 2016 > >>> > >>> Good to know, thanks for stopping by. > >>> > >> > >> Yeah the "its <current> year" meme has been making its rounds of the > >> internet. > >> > >> anyhow, my 2017 question is about avahi. right now i have USE=gtk and > >> gtk3, where gtk really means gtk2. i'm not going to change that because > >> it fits QA's specs. but i could remove it altogether and just drop gtk2 > >> support for the next release. good idea? bad idea? i guess i'm asking > >> whats the status of gtk2 in gentoo seeing as its dead upstream. > > > > From QA's pov, the gtk2 support is up to you, but I also would recommend > > adding a gtk2 use flag if you keep it around. The idea is to eventually > > get away from the non-versioned use flag. > > It wouldn't be adding, it would be renaming a flag which is possible but > annoying. Anyhow I'll cross that bridge after the next release of avahi.
Ok, I did mis-speak a bit here. You can keep the gtk use flag, but it refers to gtk2 only. The gtk3 use flag should be used for gtk3. Thanks, William
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
