On 20 May 2016 02:16, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > I would like if such a function would explicitly document that calling > this function means the caller should DEPEND on an awk provider. > Similarly, I would like that all ebuild that call 'sed' actually DEPEND > on sed, not just half of them. > I would also like that no ebuild would assume packages in @system to be > present, beyond those dictated by PMS (unpackers and such).
this is all a terrible terrible idea and has been hashed/explained a number of times on this list. have you ever tried looking at the tools configure scripts run ? -mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
