-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 04/13/2016 12:19 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 08:55:56 -0400 NP-Hardass
> <np-hard...@gentoo.org> wrote: [...]
>> The idea was partly due to consistency.  Rather than calling
>> mate_this gnome2_that, it'd provide one namespace.  Additionally
>> as mentioned in my initial email, since GNOME and MATE aren't
>> always in synch, if the gnome2 eclass chooses to change
>> something, and it's better that mate eclass stays with what we
>> have, all I have to do is fill in the stub, and all ebuilds
>> retain their current implementation.  Otherwise, I'd have to mass
>> edit all ebuilds to replace the offending gnome2_ with mate_.
> 
> yep, makes sense
> 
>> Furthermore, there was a discussion a long time ago about how 
>> functions shouldn't be called without an explicit inherit.  That
>> means that even if the mate eclass uses gnome2, if I opt to call
>> gnome2 directly in the ebuild, I have to explicitly inherit it
>> (which mostly defeats the purpose of inheriting it in the mate
>> eclass).
> 
> nah, this isnt true in your case: you can define mate.eclass' API
> to always include gnome2.eclass, making it ok to use gnome2
> functions by inheriting only mate.eclass. this means you can never
> drop gnome2.eclass from mate.eclass though, which may not be
> desired
> 
I'm unfamiliar with this.  Do you have a reference that I can look at?
> 
>> This has an added bonus, which is that the gnome2 eclass inherits
>> gnome.org, so I have to make sure to re-inherit mate-desktop.org
>> whenever gnome2 is (re)inherited to prevent all of variables like
>> SRC_URI from  being overwritten.  Hope that I'm conveying that
>> logic adequately.
> 
> ok, maybe you could add a comment that no ebuild should inherit
> both gnome2 & mate eclasses then
> 


- -- 
NP-Hardass
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=kgsm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to