-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Am Samstag, 12. Dezember 2015, 10:15:05 schrieb Duncan:
> 
> What I would have expected to see here (and in other docs-related patches)
> would be cleanly separate EAPI-5 vs. EAPI-6 descriptions, on separate
> lines, so when EAPI-5 support cleanup time comes, it's easy to simply
> delete EAPI-5 lines.  Something like:
> 

Well... In a way that certainly makes sense. However, ...

Once this is out I would personally prefer all bumps to be also EAPI bumps, 
and all new perl-module.eclass ebuilds to use EAPI=6. Adding extensive 
documentation about EAPI=5 seems to be counterproductive there.

- -- 

Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer 
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.1
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=jmuY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to