On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:00:55AM -0800, Zac Medico wrote: > On 12/01/2015 08:50 AM, William Hubbs wrote: > > The "container" keyword, being generic, would have its meaning expanded > > to cover new container systems as they come along. This means if a > > service script has the keyword "-container" it will not work under any > > current or future container systems. On the other hand, adding > > "container" means it will work under all of them. > > If it's similar to how license groups work, then there is room for doing > things like "-@container docker" which means no containers except > docker, or "@container -docker" which means all containers except > docker. Keyword groups can be implemented using a simple expansion > mechanism, just like license groups. Keyword groups are an interesting idea; I'll think about this approach.
William
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
