Dnia 30 listopada 2015 10:18:53 CET, "Gregory M. Turner" <g...@be-evil.net> napisał(a): >On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> >wrote: >> On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 19:56:04 -0800 >> "Gregory M. Turner" <g...@be-evil.net> wrote: >> > the mess gets magically cleaned up by robots somehow. >> >> Sadly := can't help here since gcc switches occur independently of >> package installs. And AFAIK revdep-rebuild doesn't help either. > >Indeed... magical hand-wavey part is the only teeny-tiny flaw with my >proposal that the problem be magically, hand-wavically solved -- >otherwise, it's rock-solid :) > >OTOH when you're spending ten hours a week waiting for revdep-rebuild, >preserved-rebuild stops seeming like an intractable fantasy and more >like an interesting puzzle you'd might as well take a crack at >solving.
It won't help either since SONAME doesn't change. And as would Ciaran say, it's the wrong solution to a different problem. > >I dunno about y'all but my not-really-that-computationally-powerful >workstation has 2000 packages installed, about three-quarters of which >seem to have forked webkit (just kidding, but it sure feels that way). > >emerge -e @world literally takes me two days if I'm lucky. If I'm >not, more like a week, with my cores left mostly idling while my >productivity is thwarted by various non-webkit-compiling distractions >like using the toilet or working. > >Point being, it's damn slow; I'm starting to feel like the guy waiting >for revdep-rebuild all week. There's gotta be a way to do it. If it >requires some encapsulation-breaking hacks to get it done (as >preserved-rebuild kinda did) it's probably well worth it. > >-gmt > >Greg Turner >g...@be-evil.net -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
