On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:53:03 -0500
Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On 31 Oct 2015 09:08, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 03:06:21 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:  
> > > On 30 Oct 2015 18:20, Michał Górny wrote:  
> > > > On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 12:03:59 +0000 (UTC) "Justin Lecher" wrote:    
> > > > > --- a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
> > > > > +++ b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
> > > > > @@ -322,8 +322,7 @@ distutils-r1_python_prepare_all() {
> > > > >  
> > > > >       _distutils-r1_disable_ez_setup
> > > > >  
> > > > > -     if [[ ${DISTUTILS_IN_SOURCE_BUILD} && ! 
> > > > > ${DISTUTILS_SINGLE_IMPL} ]]
> > > > > -     then
> > > > > +     if [[ ${DISTUTILS_IN_SOURCE_BUILD} && ! 
> > > > > ${DISTUTILS_SINGLE_IMPL} ]]; then    
> > > > 
> > > > This was intentionally wrapped to stay within 72-column line width. Not
> > > > saying the eclass is perfect in keeping text width, especially with
> > > > others committing random changes to it, but that's no reason to
> > > > introduce further offenders.    
> > > 
> > > Gentoo has never had a hard 80-col rule let alone 72-cols.  forcing a wrap
> > > here makes no sense and the new version is an improvement.  
> > 
> > For years, Gentoo was unable to make *any* *sane* *global* rules. Which
> > doesn't mean everything needs to be as crappy as the overall Gentoo
> > 'quality'.  
> 
> you forgot "imo".  we've had commonly accepted standards that people generally
> kept to, some of which were more fuzzy than others.  but we've never had a 
> hard
> 80 col rule and claiming that 72 col is an improvement is pretty hard to
> swallow.  there's no reasonable argument for such minimal restrictions in
> todays's world, and "it's always been that way" doesn't fly.

How about this; my terminal barely fits 90 characters? Of course,
I could then just shot arbitrarily at 90 but for 10 characters... I'd
rather use the old standard 80. Minus 8 characters for friendly e-mail
quoting, which is also kinda 'old standard'.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>

Attachment: pgpmvHF9la6RY.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to