On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:53:03 -0500 Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 31 Oct 2015 09:08, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 03:06:21 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > On 30 Oct 2015 18:20, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 12:03:59 +0000 (UTC) "Justin Lecher" wrote: > > > > > --- a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass > > > > > +++ b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass > > > > > @@ -322,8 +322,7 @@ distutils-r1_python_prepare_all() { > > > > > > > > > > _distutils-r1_disable_ez_setup > > > > > > > > > > - if [[ ${DISTUTILS_IN_SOURCE_BUILD} && ! > > > > > ${DISTUTILS_SINGLE_IMPL} ]] > > > > > - then > > > > > + if [[ ${DISTUTILS_IN_SOURCE_BUILD} && ! > > > > > ${DISTUTILS_SINGLE_IMPL} ]]; then > > > > > > > > This was intentionally wrapped to stay within 72-column line width. Not > > > > saying the eclass is perfect in keeping text width, especially with > > > > others committing random changes to it, but that's no reason to > > > > introduce further offenders. > > > > > > Gentoo has never had a hard 80-col rule let alone 72-cols. forcing a wrap > > > here makes no sense and the new version is an improvement. > > > > For years, Gentoo was unable to make *any* *sane* *global* rules. Which > > doesn't mean everything needs to be as crappy as the overall Gentoo > > 'quality'. > > you forgot "imo". we've had commonly accepted standards that people generally > kept to, some of which were more fuzzy than others. but we've never had a > hard > 80 col rule and claiming that 72 col is an improvement is pretty hard to > swallow. there's no reasonable argument for such minimal restrictions in > todays's world, and "it's always been that way" doesn't fly. How about this; my terminal barely fits 90 characters? Of course, I could then just shot arbitrarily at 90 but for 10 characters... I'd rather use the old standard 80. Minus 8 characters for friendly e-mail quoting, which is also kinda 'old standard'. -- Best regards, Michał Górny <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>
pgpmvHF9la6RY.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature