On 01.11.2015 20:23, hasufell wrote: > On 11/01/2015 06:44 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote: >> There's been a lot of discussion about relying on GitHub for pull >> requests and code review and such, so I have set up a Phabricator >> instance against gentoo.git to see how a free alternative might work. >> >> Here's a few examples of how things could work: >> >> General post-commit review: >> http://phabricator.astralcloak.net/rGENTOO27ba62d0c7fcabdc79ce82a064b43d67b3b11cca >> >> Tracking commits with issues that need attention: >> http://phabricator.astralcloak.net/audit/query/open/ >> >> Pre-commit review: http://phabricator.astralcloak.net/D1 >> >> Phabricator also has all sorts of fancy (optional) features that could >> be useful for collaborative development (see http://phabricator.org/ for >> more info). >> >> What do you think? >> >> > > phabricator is horrible. I'll definitely use it less (if at all) than > bugzilla. >
On 10.10.2015 16:15, Julian Ospald wrote: > That's a great start for us, having developers announce publicly that > they will ignore our project or require us to create bugs for every > missing "|| die" in an ebuild. *chuckles*
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
