-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 10/28/2015 12:23 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 10/28/15 7:16 AM, hasufell wrote: >> On 10/28/2015 07:23 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: >>> Agreed. If there's one choice then "ssl" should be used. >>> openssl/libressl/etc should really be considered sub-flags of >>> ssl. > > This is what I did with curl. USE=ssl means one and exactly one > ssl provider must be specified. I suggested making it a model > gentoo wide, but there were criticisms, I forget what, but the made > sense to me at teh time.
Such a setup makes sense to me as well, although likely want it to be more generic and maybe use a prioritized list rather than a use expand per package / group of packages. Maybe something similar to python_compat can be used for the TLS / crypto provider - -- Kristian Fiskerstrand Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJWMLIvAAoJECULev7WN52Fdb8IALLlM/763gnsx3iEc7NIh7IL HWDfBwfY2vuDKWGGVlKIXn2CZfIrDhcqOZxtprFcrK073q+Gu6ZDqVd+og+EWTJw Erv7aq5Mi4poBPtcQT6P3CJG77RXCQPdzgPG6K8FaWyVPh+RkKFr7VsJ615visk6 UmRbwpehU51Vb/qTWl94J1z0SvIo3gusSzeK9FpkSFimrZQtsByWFtIijWYeToLH Mv4hl7BVwpHWctTwLDObuqkl+zWEITapJ3CIYz93jrfnyWZXi/DFvOyWcK3YOES2 vDcIDWGKt0SunZgka0VTJ+CTbfCcuvxb0sXUJfJNdy6P/p7aJyzZllPEZ2ciVVk= =iN64 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
