On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld <zx...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> I assume there are developers hard
> at work adding the flag to each and every package.

Keep in mind that it isn't always a drop-in replacement.  If it were
we'd just make a virtual for libssl and you wouldn't need to mess with
flags at all.

Some upstreams may support libressl quickly, some might support it
more slowly, and some may or may not ever support it.  So, I suspect
that this will look a lot like trying to switch over to libav - you
might have to change what applications you're using in some cases if
you really want to do it.  As with libav you may see one library or
the other "win" in the end which should make things simpler, but I
suspect that in the meantime there may be a lot of bundling/etc.

When changes require patches and upstream hasn't committed to merging
them, that creates a potential maintenance burden and if package
maintainers aren't willing to undertake this then we should probably
figure out how that is going to work, unless we just plan to ignore
these packages for now.

If it is just a matter of sticking a simple sed in an ebuild and the
libressl team doesn't mind dealing with rare breakage that is probably
less of an issue.

-- 
Rich

Reply via email to