On 09/18/2015 10:30 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 23:17:11 +0000 (UTC) > Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > >> Alexis Ballier posted on Thu, 17 Sep 2015 18:36:06 +0200 as excerpted: >> >>> if [ "${PV#9999}" != "${PV}" ] ; then >>> SCM="git-r3" >>> fi >> >> [and elsewhere] >> >> I've seen this asked in other eclass review contexts, but not for >> awhile... >> >> Since gentoo requires bash, why are you using old borne shell >> compatibility test logic? Why not use [[ ]] tests and avoid the need >> for the "", since bash then can treat variables as a unit and quotes >> are only needed if the tested strings include variable-external space >> (thus avoiding quote-logic errors if you accidentally forget the >> quotes)? >> > > just a matter of taste I'd say: I'm used to write portable shell code > since, as you say, sometimes bash is not necessarily there, or worse: in > some worlds, gpl3, hence bash, is just banned. > > because of this, I'm more used to the [ "" ] constructs and hence find > it prettier :) highly subjective though. > > also, you can see the quotes around ${PV} aren't useful in that > context either, which is again just a matter of what my eyes are used to > see :) > > Alexis. > > [...] >
eclasses (and ebuilds) are always bash in gentoo and I'd vote for writing "true" bash code, to stay consistent