-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 09/17/2015 12:27 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Ian Stakenvicius <a...@gentoo.org> > wrote: >>
.. > > So, part of me really wonders if it is worth it just to save a > bunch of revbumps that probably could be done by a script and with > git it can even happen atomically and with the possibility of > review or testing. > Another thing that strikes me is separation of stable vs ~arch behavior. This applies in particular with in-place eclass alterations. Users on ~arch should normally expect more activity (in particular number of builds and changes, that is after all its definition). Stable users on the other hand might want slower update cycle for non-security upgrades. Reading this thread I got hit with a question whether this boundary is properly protected if doing in-place eclass changes? - -- Kristian Fiskerstrand Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJV+qq0AAoJECULev7WN52FkUIH/2P2tqTNf5YAU7VnB4Mx/glv Ccqu/rlS+bJsBpJJRombIUwYnKOu+f9Fl49VCsOGVxmulKRR0lciTA4VKGo4XLQb zk0DGudcPNIvUPuVUojDhzhS9RHoVZuwwZmn4SG6gX7XoFB5fkYYTNE7pt0YCmao oP4Ku/6df4Y574BHUo01AXlipWnr7HLfIxKTifXXbDhW6O5z9WYfMOd7bHysJz8W Rk+QzIkDkpSC7hcofVtM24gAH/BYHe67rV2bMJsVyeoseuzT2PY9rZdFdvVqJWU8 mSLdEqOdCC+bShtIeSMYV+r0ZsbrskPONvdILadi+Be5bkNSHh7UIDPZXVbanD4= =5p9L -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
