-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 09/16/2015 07:09 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Andreas K. Huettel > <dilfri...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> Hi all,
.. > > I'll go ahead and start a tangent on this thread right here. As a > first step can we separately consider the proposal to require a > revbump anytime a package's RDEPENDS changes? I'm referring here > to directly-specified RDEPENDS, not those inherited from an eclass > or virtual. > > I agree completely that we need to solve the eclass and virtual > issue and that is by far the stickier part of the mess. However, > can we at least get ebuild authors to stop making changes to their > RDEPENDS without revbumps? That would certainly be a step in the right direction fwiw, I've been running for quite a while with dynamic deps disabled on a few of my computers for quite some time, specifically the workstations (desktop/laptop), and the sun hasn't dropped out of the sky yet. - -- Kristian Fiskerstrand Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJV+qdvAAoJECULev7WN52FfBEIAIuONm0m+pxG2q+5ATlY2jgj GI9mVVi0R2AF8/9zqnBYmVAUaK7Hizn/yMBRkMasJt/J3SiQkuVwnnynwY8mIjOf hHFAd205asghcvZsNLl4idiVxN6BsJYTFOgVjLfTYwqyNIESsrlyNULz8UZGZsDr 6X/pdX7LZSW3gkPMN/rrasOvHyu/hQ2Pp75WK8YxmJwqxIlAxSWuO4Znjf1Sl2n8 qfwaAK5XXTEUG+h+sP8OGNhGsb9Tm+pFGmlJ4LpiiN2DPkg0i4oXK4Wec7U5Aana GaggPYGeH3XWld47ZhV2pXyyw8nGDz7R7rXCVFoSmC9a1sEvRH4jHQXRUgagmwI= =wxzt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
