On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Kent Fredric <kentfred...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 14 September 2015 at 20:22, konsolebox <konsole...@gmail.com> wrote: >> If we use an arithmetic operator like ~> then that could be decided > > As a counter proposal I'd suggest a different suffix character than > "*" instead. It just seems less confusing to have something like > > =cat/foo-1.30+ > > Instead of > > ~>cat/foo-1.30 > > Because ~> to me conveys some combination of ~ and > effects, when it > is neither of those two.
I thought ~> is good as it's already famous to fellow Ruby users but I don't mind. =cat/foo-1.30+ seems good as well.
