-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 02:18 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 12/08/15 02:00 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
>>>> pkg_pretend() { if use qt4; then required_use -qt5 else
>>>> required_use qt5 fi }
>
>>> And how would the PM understand that -qt5 is conditional
>>> upon qt4? Such knowledge is required if it's supposed to
>>> auto-resolve stuff...
>
>> Right, the above was too simple (and wrong). It should have
>> been:
>
>> pkg_pretend() { use qt4 && use qt5 && required_use -qt5 use
>> qt4 || use qt5 || required_use qt4 }
>
>
> I think Ciaran's point was more, if required_use is going to
> i.e. elog, it needs to elog that qt4 is being enabled because
> neither-of qt4 or qt5 are *ON*, and similarly for why qt5 is
> being disabled.
^^^ corrected logic
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iF4EAREIAAYFAlXLjh8ACgkQAJxUfCtlWe3TTAEAuJPVQQ9yoWBeBTRH2AFnFZoW
3aWWdhmClQRMo3MI43IBANkaRZOtWHhnWi31wvK+Pw0GvzkAmzEaWOFS7YxxWORO
=ccVT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
