On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 10:39:25AM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Ben de Groot <yng...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> I don't see any strong technical reason to switch from python2 + > >> python3 to python2-only enabled. Some people don't like having two > >> versions of python installed -- that's about the gist of it. > > > > Indeed, there is no strong technical reason, except that some people > > like to keep their systems more lean. But I think having a smaller > > stage3 tarball is a more important reason. The python team has > > historically left that up to the RelEng team, which has been averse to > > handling that themselves. > > > >> So, I'm personally not going to make that change without some kind of > >> vote on it. I can arrange a vote within the python team if you like. > > > > I would like to hear from the other team members, yes. > > I have sympathy towards those who are asking for only one Python in > stages (as in, I would be fine with that), but I very much think we > should not leave Python 3 out of generally installed systems by > default. We need to move through the transition, and increasing the > barriers to Python 3 adoption will only make that process slower. > > I also feel like a voting process for this is probably not a solution.
I also very much dislike shipping only python2. Having only one python is admirable and I'm all for it but if we only ship one by default it should be python3. Fedora's next release is going to ship only python3 in all their media (livecd, default install etc). Of course they will allow python2 to be installed too but that will have to be a concious choice by the user. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_3_as_Default I think the change next weekend should be as originally stated and have 2_7,3_4. Later on (perhaps we can see how fedora manages) we can see if dropping 2_7 from the default stages would be doable. -- Jason
